R’Kok: Yes, Ashtar is indecisive
Channel: A.S.
My dearest Earth friends,
This is R’Kok speaking. I greet you in peace and love.
There’s been some pushback to the Netanyahu paragraph in Einostraee’s last message. I can see the points that people are making. Fair points.
Ultimately that was just an, arguably bad, way to illustrate that it’s quite a step for Pleiadians to turn to me, the war criminal, for guidance.
The point wasn’t to say that Ashtar is equivalent to Netanyahu, of course he isn’t.
But yeah, maybe that was just a bad remark that didn’t take the situation and history and behind-the-scenes things into account.
Us galactics are imperfect individuals, and at times we may be wrong. Kudo’s for thinking for yourself and speaking up.
In the comment section, someone also suggested we learn from you Earth humans. Yes, we should do that more. But now that we’re being blunt about the flaws of the Pleiadians: it’s sometimes difficult for Pleiadians to fully 100% take Earth humans seriously because you’re so young.
Many Pleiadians are at least hundreds of years old and often they’re over a thousand. Okay, so even a 50 year old human… is maybe one twentieth the age of a Pleiadian.
Would you seek advice from a two year old? Probably not. But just as you’re something like 20 times as old as a two year old…. Pleiadians are often something like 20 times as old as you are.
Now obviously Pleiadians don’t literally think of you as 2 year olds, but look, would you go out of your way to seek advice from people significantly younger than yourself? Suppose you’re 40 year old, do you go out of your way to ask 18 year olds what you should do? Probably not, right? But well, the age gap between you and 18 year olds is far smaller than between you and the average Pleiadian.
You might argue “but us Earth humans learn far more in 40 years than Pleiadians learn in 40 years” and that’s true, but do you go out of your way to ask an 18 year old for advice whose teenage years were turbulent and filled with challenges and lessons?
You can be annoyed at Pleiadians for this, but most likely you yourself also have that very same age bias that Pleiadians do.
As above, so below — if you get annoyed at someone, make sure you’re not condemning them for a flaw that you also have.
This isn’t to say that Pleiadians don’t listen to or learn from Earth humans at all, they do, but there is some age bias there. Good point though, I’ll keep pointing out that Pleiadians should listen to and learn from Earth humans more (and from other very very young people).
At least I’m old and cranky, so Pleiadians have an easier time taking me seriously.
The last messages have talked about the flaws of Pleiadians, which exist, but Pleiadians genuinely also have a whole lot of wonderful qualities. I invite you to think in a nuanced way: Pleiadians aren’t perfect, but neither are they horrible or completely detached. Meeting Pleiadians and interacting with them is still going to be a ten out of ten experience (or close to that) for most people, when that happens.
If Pleiadians hadn’t helped you, often in ways that caused Pleiadians casualties, your situation would be far worse right now. They do care, and they are helping you behind the scenes.
Next up, I want to make sure that we don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater, and hence I do want to defend Einostraee’s core claim that while Ashtar’s council is smart and it has its qualities, they’re also indecisive.
I get that this goes against the common view.
And I get that this may be emotionally uncomfortable, because sure, emotionally it feels better to think that some kind of perfect being is in charge and is leading everything towards a perfect outcome.
This is also why so many people still think that the person in the white house is the real Trump, and that he’s incredibly smart and well-informed and righteous and fully in control, and that everything he does is the perfect 5D chess move to liberate Earth. Even though believing that in late 2025 is frankly pretty ridiculous. Now yes some things that person does are in fact positive, but he’s no flawless white hat.
Similarly, I think some common sense reasoning based on first principles shows that Einostraee is right that Ashtar’s council has its positive traits, but they’re also indecisive.
Suppose that Ashtar’s council is decisive, and that in let’s say 2012 they declare that let’s say 2013 is the moment of first contact. Okay, then it’s logical that around 2012 you see “soon” messages being put out, because first contact is one year away. But obviously, in this case first contact would have happened back in 2013, and it didn’t. Sure, maybe there’s a delay or unexpected obstacle once or twice, but you wouldn’t see “soon” messages being put out monthly by lots of different people for over a decade.
Alternatively, suppose that Ashtar’s council is decisive, and that in let’s say 2012 they declare that let’s say 2030 is the moment of first contact. Well in this case, you wouldn’t see lots of Earth people over the last decade channeling lots of galactics saying “soon.” After all, those galactics would know that Ashtar said it’s 2030, so they wouldn’t say “soon” in for example 2015. But in fact, lots of messages in 2015 and other previous years have said “soon.”
Alternatively, suppose that Ashtar’s council is decisive, and that in let’s say 2012 they declare that first contact or Earth liberation will happen when certain obstacles are removed or when certain milestones are reached, for example when human consciousness reaches a certain level. Okay, well in this case, galactics would realize that in 2012 and in 2013 and in 2014, first contact or Earth liberation in fact is not “soon.” So you wouldn’t have 2012 and 2013 and 2014 etc messages saying “soon.” But you did have those messages.
Basically, if Ashtar’s council is decisive, you can’t have a situation where lots of different Earth humans channel lots of different galactics who all say “soon” over a decade or longer. But in fact, that’s exactly what has happened.
The explanation for that is that Ashtar’s council is indeed indecisive. If we accept that, things make logical sense. Galactics keep hearing from Ashtar’s council “soon”, so they keep putting out messages saying “soon”, but then Ashtar’s council indecisively delays things, and so nothing happens. Which is why there have been “soon” messages for over a decade.
The only other explanation is that every single channeler who’s ever made a “soon” statement is in fact a fake channeler. This includes not just people who have made formal predictions with a date given, but also just people who have put out messages in which a galactic says a throwaway line that Earth liberation or first contact isn’t far off.
So even if a channeler says “I don’t do predictions / dates”, well if they put out a message three years ago which has language indicating that first contact or galactic intervention isn’t far off… that’s now a fake channeler. If you want to go with this alternative explanation.
This alternative position is logically consistent, but note that you would have to label a whole lot of people as fake channelers. This channeler would be a fake channeler. And also, that other channeler that you like quite a bit has probably indicated “soon” or “it’s not too far off now” in some old message, so they are now a fake channeler too.
Look, the bottom line is, if a group keeps saying “soon we’ll take action” for over a decade but then they never take action… their leadership is probably indecisive. Right? Or they’re complete idiots, but we have spaceships so we’re probably not complete idiots.
Again, Einostraee is imperfect. She’s not necessarily right about everything. You don’t need to agree with everything in her messages.
In fact, it’s healthy to treat channeled messages you read as one person’s perspective, rather than as the sole objective truth.
However, I think it’s hard to dispute Einostraee’s central “Ashtar’s council is indecisive” claim, if you think about it logically.
Finally, we’ve been zooming in on the flaws of Ashtar. Keep in mind that he has far more virtues and skills than he has flaws. He’s not perfect, no flesh and blood being is. If he was perfect, he wouldn’t be a physical being. Still, honestly, he is a great leader.
He does a whole lot of things well. You just don’t hear about them.
If you think you’d do better in Ashtar’s chair than he does: no you wouldn’t. You don’t even see one tenth of the complexity of the Earth operation. Einostraee doesn’t even see a quarter of the complexity.
You almost certainly have more flaws than Ashtar does. And if we’d purely zoom in on your flaws, you wouldn’t look good either.
Yes Ashtar can use more decisiveness, but he’s literally studying under me right now to address that flaw of his. Isn’t it a great quality of a leader to publicly acknowledge his flaws and work to address them?
With all that said, I do acknowledge that many Earth people need urgent help, and that him working on himself isn’t directly helping you. I’ll do my best to as soon as possible get Ashtar’s council to actually start making decisions and sticking with them.
And if you can see that Ashtar is neither perfect, nor evil, nor an idiot, but instead that he’s a well-meaning and hard-working man with many qualities and also some flaws… then you’re far ahead of most Earth humans.
Because when we land, we really are not looking to get worshipped (or demonized, if we don’t immediately fix every single Earth problem on day 1).
Instead, let’s embrace each other in our humanness.
With love,
R’Kok
** These messages are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by this writer. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post
If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/
If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://eraoflight.com/2025/01/11/hakann-onion-healing/